Book a Demo

Author Topic: Sequence Diagram- Reverse Enggineering  (Read 2702 times)

Moyeen

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Sequence Diagram- Reverse Enggineering
« on: April 28, 2008, 11:35:37 pm »
Hi,
I have code and model in synch. Developer  made changes to  many methods by modifying/deleting/adding in the source code Now i have reverse engineered the code/synchronise the code.ButnNow i am not able to find what sequence diagrams are affected.
What is best of showing the VOPC(view of participating classess in the sequence diagram)

Moyeen

  • EA Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Sequence Diagram- Reverse Enggineering
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2008, 02:43:18 pm »
Atleast the sparx support team should provide some answer to query

Eve

  • EA Administrator
  • EA Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 8110
  • Karma: +119/-20
    • View Profile
Re: Sequence Diagram- Reverse Enggineering
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2008, 03:16:26 pm »
This is primarily a user forum not a support forum, despite the regular contributions from Sparx Systems   If you want support from Sparx Systems you should send an email to sparx support.

Sorry, I don't have your answer.

Dermot

  • EA Administrator
  • EA User
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
  • Karma: +7/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Sequence Diagram- Reverse Enggineering
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2008, 03:41:16 pm »
In general principle, the sequence diagram is set up pre-writing the source code as an indicator of the calls. It is not something that is directly supported for reverse engineering.  However if you are running a compiler that is supported in Ea's Build/Test/Run - then what can do is generate sequence diagrams from a run of the new code.  Be aware though that this will only record the sequence of calls you run through in your test.  If there are obscure calls you would need to run tests to capture these.  So in short, you can try running a Sequence generation and get it verified by your coders that nothing new is missed.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2008, 03:42:20 pm by Dermot »