Book a Demo

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RealPecho

Pages: [1] 2
1
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: _tagGroupings Ignored in EA 16.1 Technology Stereotype
« on: February 23, 2026, 09:33:54 pm »
Thanks! now it is working

2
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: _tagGroupings Ignored in EA 16.1 Technology Stereotype
« on: February 22, 2026, 11:29:07 pm »
thank you for your reply!  :-*

I understand that I should extend the same metaclass as SysML1.4::FlowProperty (not Class). However, in EA 16.1 MDG Technology modeling I do not see Property available in the “Extend Metaclass” dialog.

Could you please clarify how I can extend the same metaclass as SysML1.4::FlowProperty in an MDG model?

3
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: _tagGroupings Ignored in EA 16.1 Technology Stereotype
« on: February 21, 2026, 02:26:54 am »
Ok, using the helper, my tagged values are now grouped correctly, but my stereotype has to extend a metaclass of type Class.

If the stereotype generalizes another stereotype, then grouping is not possible.

With this setup, I cannot drop the element as a child of a SysML1.4::Block, because the element is no longer a Property like SysML1.4::FlowProperty.

I don’t know how to make the element a Property again

4
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / _tagGroupings Ignored in EA 16.1 Technology Stereotype
« on: February 21, 2026, 01:46:01 am »
Hi,

In my MDG Technology, I created a stereotype SignalSpecification with a generalization to SysML1.4::FlowProperty in EA 16.1. I added several tagged values:

  • Physical (Type: QuantityKind, enumeration)
    Unit (Type: SI_Unit, enumeration)
    MaxValue (Type: int)
    MinValue (Type: int)
    Accuracy (Type: int)
    Resolution (Type: int)
    …

I also added _tagGroupings (Type: <none>, Initial Value):
Code: [Select]
Unit=PhysicalAttributes;Physical=PhysicalAttributes;MaxValue=SignalProperties;MinValue=SignalProperties;Accuracy=SignalProperties;Resolution=SignalProperties;
Following the Sparx example: https://sparxsystems.com/enterprise_architect_user_guide/17.1/modeling_frameworks/define_tag_groupings.html

After regenerating the Technology, the tagged values appear, but the grouping is ignored.

Question: How can tagged values be properly grouped in a Technology stereotype in EA 16.1?


5
General Board / Re: How to create a relationship between a "signal" and a transition (StateMachine)
« on: May 26, 2023, 06:10:22 pm »
yes. ok lets say the condition is, when the signal is bigger than a treshhold. i have to model the threshold as an element also.
in this case how to create a linik (relationship) between this elements and the condition (Guard)?

6
General Board / How to create a relationship between a "signal" and a transition (StateMachine)
« on: May 26, 2023, 05:24:04 pm »
In a state machine i'm using to describe the transition some signal names to describe the guard.
The signals are already in the model defined with an element of type "Signal".
Is there any way to create using SysML or UML a relationship between?
Because in my model the signal are defined, but they doesn't have a relationship link

7
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: Name of the action not always at the same place
« on: March 14, 2023, 11:51:07 pm »
ok. I add an element (Action Call Behaviout) from the SysML Toolbox and the name was on the top, then I change the stereotype of the element and the name go to the middle. Here is the Shape Script (I put some ... to make shorteer the text:

Code: [Select]
shape main
{
noshadow = "true";
if (HasTag("ElementType","Mechanical"))
{
setfillcolor(210,108,30);
}
...
else if (HasTag("ElementType","Mechatronical"))
{
setfillcolor(255,228,188);
}
DrawNativeShape();
}

decoration Type
{
orientation = "SW";
if (HasTag("showElementType","true"))
{
if (HasTag("isSignal","true"))
{
println("Sig");
}
...
else if (HasTag("ElementType","Mechatronical"))
{
println("Mea");
}
}
}

decoration SIL
{
orientation = "NW";
if (HasTag("showSafetyIntegrity","true"))
{
if (HasTag("SafetyIntegrity","None"))
{
// hide label
HideLabel("");
}
else
{
// Not applicable
if (HasTag("SafetyIntegrity","Not applicable"))
{
setfillcolor(255, 255, 255);
print("Na");
RoundRect(0,0,100,100,4,4);
}
....
}
}
}

shape RelatedElement
{
if(HasProperty("Connector.Type", "Realisation"))
{
if(HasProperty("Element.IsTarget"))
{
SetCompartmentName("ExternalRequirements");
AppendCompartmentText("Req #Element.Name#");
}
}
if(HasProperty("Connector.Type", "Dependency"))
{
if(HasProperty("Element.IsSource"))
{
SetCompartmentName("DerivedRequirements");
AppendCompartmentText("Req #Element.Name#");
}
}
if(HasProperty("Connector.Type", "Abstraction"))
{
if(HasProperty("Element.IsTarget"))
{
SetCompartmentName("AllocatedTo");
AppendCompartmentText("#Element.Name#");
}
}
}
I don't have any control for the text

8
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: Name of the action not always at the same place
« on: March 14, 2023, 09:49:55 pm »
I though also this point, but both element have the same stereotype -> same shape script

do you know how to control this in the shape script?

9
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Name of the action not always at the same place
« on: March 14, 2023, 03:24:31 am »
why the name of the action is in the middle of the element and not in the top?
I use the same stereotype twice, but the position of the name is ddifferent. how can I control this?



10
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: How to modify the Parameters of ActivityParameters in the technology
« on: March 11, 2023, 12:46:07 am »
I feared that   :o

11
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / How to modify the Parameters of ActivityParameters in the technology
« on: March 10, 2023, 11:15:52 pm »
Hi, when I insert an ActivitParameter in my model it will created with the attribute (parameter) Type: Integer.

I would like to create en extended stereotype of the ActivityParameter with the default type: none

I don't find this option in the manual. it is possible to make this change? with the profile helper?

12
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: How to sort differents Diagrams within my own technology
« on: February 22, 2023, 02:56:54 am »
Thank you! the order of the stereotypes didn't work, but the z-order yes! :-)

13
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / How to sort differents Diagrams within my own technology
« on: February 22, 2023, 12:08:11 am »
I created my own technology extending UML and SysML and I have defined various Diagrams. This is working fine.

When I use the tecnology during modelling and i want to add a diagram, i get the list of possible diagrams. The list of diagrams is sorted randomly, how can i do in my own technology to get the desired order for the diagrams?

14
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / How to allocate the own technology within the perspective "System Engineering"
« on: January 26, 2023, 02:12:21 am »
Hi guys, how can i configure my own technology to be allocated together with the others system engineering technologies?

Toolbox -> Change Perspective -> SystemEngineering -> xx

https://github.com/RealPecho/MDG/blob/main/toolbox.png

15
Automation Interface, Add-Ins and Tools / Re: New MDG: Instance doesn't take over the tagged values from the activity/block
« on: January 26, 2023, 01:16:22 am »
Thank you Guys! Now it is clear for me.
I tested again the old technology and it is not taking over the tagged values. I don't know where i saw this effect  :-\

Pages: [1] 2